O título desse livro traz mais uma vez o problema da tradução de 'embodied'. Em meus trabalhos de tradução, diversas palavras já chegaram a constituir um problema (que deve ser resolvido, preferivelmente em definitivo, em uma só tentativa): o que os autores que utilizam a tal palavra querem dizer com aquilo? Um exemplo é 'hardwired', em neurociência. Pensei que 'neurofilamentado' poderia ser a solução, mas além de ser uma palavra horrenda, não resolve o assunto. Resultado: ficou mesmo 'neurointegrado', e o contexto fornece as indefectíveis nuances. 'Embodied cognition', além de ser um truismo para quem não tem veleidades metafísicas ou transcendentais, é um caveat: toda cognição vem do real, do material, e nesse domínio se movimenta, necessitando de um substrato corporal para se desenvolver. Vou adotar, a partir de agora, 'cognição materializada' (até uma futura alternativa possível).
With respect to the possible outlining of new models of the process of knowledge construction, we are really faced, at the moment, with the appearance of a new frontier: a frontier that appears strictly linked to the emergence of a conceptual revolution at the level of the analysis of that peculiar entanglement of complexity, information, causality, meaning, emergence, teleology and intentionality that characterizes the unfolding of the "natural forms" of human cognition. To recognize some of the peculiar knots of this particular conceptual revolution precisely constitutes the first target of the volume.
Cognitive activity is rooted in Reality, but at the same time represents the necessary means whereby Reality can embody itself in an objective way: i.e., in accordance with an in-depth nesting process and a surface unfolding of operational meaning. In this sense, the objectivity of Reality is also proportionate to the autonomy reached by cognitive processes. Within this conceptual framework, reference procedures thus appear as related to the modalities providing the successful constitution of the channel, of the actual link, in particular, established at the neural level between operations of vision and thought. Such procedures ensure not a simple "regimentation" or an adequate replica, but, on the contrary, the real constitution of a cognitive autonomy in accordance with the truth. A method thus emerges which is simultaneously project, telos and regulating activity: a code that becomes process, positing itself as the foundation of a constantly renewed synthesis between function and meaning. In this sense, at the level of cultural evolution, reference procedures act as guide, mirror and canalisation with respect to primary information flows and involved selective forces. They also constitute a precise support for the operations which "imprison" meaning and "inscribe" the "file" considered as an autonomous categorial (and generating) system. In this way, they offer themselves as the actual instruments for the constant renewal of the code, for the invention and the actual articulation of an ever-new incompressibility.
Causality, Meaningful Complexity and Embodied Cognition
A. Carsetti
Causality, Meaningful Complexity and Embodied Cognition
A. Carsetti
Springer 2010 360 pages PDF 2,3 MB
http://www.filesonic.com/file/47622437/9048135281.rar
http://www.filesonic.com/file/47622437/9048135281.rar
